首页> 外文OA文献 >Differential impact of anxiety symptoms and anxiety disorders on treatment outcome for psychotic depression in the STOP-PD study
【2h】

Differential impact of anxiety symptoms and anxiety disorders on treatment outcome for psychotic depression in the STOP-PD study

机译:在sTOp-pD研究中,焦虑症状和焦虑症对精神病性抑郁症治疗结果的不同影响

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

BACKGROUND: There are conflicting results on the impact of anxiety on depression outcomes. The impact of anxiety has not been studied in major depression with psychotic features (\u22psychotic depression\u22).AIMS: We assessed the impact of specific anxiety symptoms and disorders on the outcomes of psychotic depression.METHODS: We analyzed data from the Study of Pharmacotherapy for Psychotic Depression that randomized 259 younger and older participants to either olanzapine plus placebo or olanzapine plus sertraline. We assessed the impact of specific anxiety symptoms from the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (\u22tension\u22, \u22anxiety\u22 and \u22somatic concerns\u22 and a composite anxiety score) and diagnoses (panic disorder and GAD) on psychotic depression outcomes using linear or logistic regression. Age, gender, education and benzodiazepine use (at baseline and end) were included as covariates.RESULTS: Anxiety symptoms at baseline and anxiety disorder diagnoses differentially impacted outcomes. On adjusted linear regression there was an association between improvement in depressive symptoms and both baseline \u22tension\u22 (coefficient=0.784; 95% CI: 0.169-1.400; p=0.013) and the composite anxiety score (regression coefficient = 0.348; 95% CI: 0.064-0.632; p=0.017). There was an interaction between \u22tension\u22 and treatment group, with better responses in those randomized to combination treatment if they had high baseline anxiety scores (coefficient=1.309; 95% CI: 0.105-2.514; p=0.033). In contrast, panic disorder was associated with worse clinical outcomes (coefficient=-3.858; 95% CI: -7.281 to -0.434; p=0.027) regardless of treatment.CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that analysis of the impact of anxiety on depression outcome needs to differentiate psychic and somatic symptoms.
机译:背景:焦虑对抑郁预后的影响存在矛盾的结果。尚未在具有精神病特征的严重抑郁症中研究焦虑的影响。目的:我们评估了特定的焦虑症状和失调对精神抑郁症结局的影响。方法:我们分析了研究的数据精神病性抑郁症的药物治疗将259名年龄较小和年龄较大的参与者随机分配至奥氮平加安慰剂或奥氮平加舍曲林。我们通过简短的精神病学评定量表(\ u22tension \ u22,\ u22anxiety \ u22和\ u22somatic关注点\ u22和综合焦虑评分)评估了特定焦虑症状的影响,并使用线性诊断对精神病性抑郁结果进行诊断(恐慌症和GAD)或逻辑回归。年龄,性别,受教育程度和使用苯二氮卓类药物(在基线和末期)作为协变量。结果:基线时的焦虑症状和焦虑症诊断出对预后的影响不同。校正线性回归后,抑郁症状的改善与基线\ u22张力\ u22(系数= 0.784; 95%CI:0.169-1.400; p = 0.013)和综合焦虑评分(回归系数= 0.348; 95%)之间存在关联CI:0.064-0.632; p = 0.017)。 \ u22tension \ u22与治疗组之间存在相互作用,如果他们的基线焦虑评分较高(系数= 1.309; 95%CI:0.105-2.514; p = 0.033),则在随机分组接受联合治疗的患者中反应更好。与此相反,无论采用何种治疗方法,恐慌症均与较差的临床预后相关(系数= -3.858; 95%CI:-7.281至-0.434; p = 0.027)。结论:我们的结果表明,焦虑对抑郁预后的影响分析需要区分心理和躯体症状。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号